PLAN S

Summary

Plan S is an initiative by cOAlition S that requires immediate open access to peer-reviewed scientific publications resulting from research funded by its members, with no embargo periods, open licences and defined routes to compliance.

Promoting organizations

Plan S is driven by cOAlition S, an international coalition of research funders launched in 2018 with the support of the European Commission and the European Research Council (ERC). It brings together national agencies, philanthropic foundations and international organisations committed to its coordinated implementation.

Objectives

The prevailing system of scholarly publishing kept some publicly and privately funded research outputs behind subscription barriers and embargo periods, limiting access and reuse. In this context, Plan S was launched in 2018 to accelerate the transition towards immediate open access to peer-reviewed scientific publications resulting from research funded by members of cOAlition S. The revised 2019 formulation states that, as a minimum, its principles were to apply to calls or application deadlines published from 1 January 2021 onwards (cOAlition S, 2019).

Its central objective is for these publications to be available without any embargo period, either in open access journals or platforms or through immediate deposit in repositories, with open licences (preferably CC BY) and with copyright retained by authors or institutions. This objective is set out in 10 principles that turn these commitments into verifiable requirements: common criteria for journals, platforms and repositories; support for open access infrastructures; institutional or funder coverage of publication fees where they exist; cost transparency requirements; restriction of the hybrid model outside transformative agreements; and assessment based on the intrinsic merit of the work rather than on the prestige of the journal or its impact factor (cOAlition S, 2019).

Implementation is structured through routes to compliance and funding conditions. The implementation guidance recognises as valid routes publication in open access journals or platforms, immediate deposit in repositories when publishing in subscription journals and, transitionally, open publication under transformative agreements. In addition, funders were expected to align their grant agreements and funding conditions with these requirements and to provide monitoring and sanction mechanisms in cases of non-compliance (cOAlition S, 2019).

Beneficiaries and stakeholders

Researchers funded fully or partly by members of cOAlition S; indirectly, universities and research support services, funding agencies, journals, platforms and repositories that need to adapt their policies and requirements.

Results

  • The documents developing Plan S were published, including its principles, implementation guidance and technical requirements, setting out licences, routes to compliance, criteria for journals, platforms and repositories, and technical conditions for the repository route (cOAlition S, 2019).
  • The Journal Checker Tool was launched, enabling authors to check whether a journal allows them to comply with their funder’s open access policy and through which route (cOAlition S, n.d.-a).
  • The report Plan S: Annual Review 2024 records 177,237 open access articles attributed to cOAlition S funders in 2024, equivalent to 82% of the total articles attributed to those funders; the report presents this figure as part of a sustained increase in open access levels over the previous four years (cOAlition S, 2025a).
  • An external evaluation was published analysing the influence of Plan S on open access publishing trends, identifying areas where its effect has been stronger or more limited, and making recommendations to consolidate its impact (de Castro et al., 2024).

Challenges

Plan S faces implementation challenges linked to disciplinary differences in publishing cultures, global inequalities in access to and funding of publication fees, administrative burden, and the possible effects on early-career researchers if research assessment remains tied to journal prestige. In addition, some instruments intended to strengthen cost transparency, such as the Journal Comparison Service, had limited uptake and were withdrawn in 2025 (cOAlition S, 2020; cOAlition S, 2025b).

Interest and transferability

Plan S is of interest to funders and universities because it does not operate as a single policy, but as a set of principles and guidance that each organisation must translate into its own funding conditions and institutional support mechanisms. Its most transferable component is the rights retention strategy, designed so that authors can continue publishing in subscription journals while complying with immediate open access requirements, through a CC BY licence applied to the accepted manuscript or final version and deposit without embargo periods (cOAlition S, n.d.-b; cOAlition S, n.d.-c).

Its transfer requires aligned contracts or policies, operational repositories and support services for authors. This adaptation can already be observed in the university sector: the Plan S and Institutions page brings together examples of rights retention institutional policies adopted by universities such as Edinburgh, Cambridge and St Andrews. The 2024 external evaluation supports this reading by noting that Plan S has acted as a source of inspiration and a driver for subsequent initiatives, especially in extending rights retention from funder policies to institutional policies for immediate open access (cOAlition S, n.d.-b; de Castro et al., 2024).

Bibliography

Specific information

Logo del Plan S

Topic: Policies supporting open science

Type of initiative: Policy / strategy / plan

Implementation scale: International

Responsible agents: Research managers

Location: Worldwide

Key words: open access, research funding, repositories, research assessment

Start and end date: 2018 -

Sustainability: Active with documented continuity

PDF Document:
Download file

Search by

Authorship information

Created on: 01/06/2021

Last updated: 24/04/2026

Author of record: Anna Villarroya

Institution author: Universitat de Barcelona