San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
Summary
DORA is an international declaration launched in 2012 to reform research assessment, promoting the evaluation of scientific merit on the basis of the content of each contribution rather than journal-based metrics. It provides recommendations, resources and tools to support responsible assessment practices.
Promoting organizations
DORA was launched in 2012 by the American Society for Cell Biology, together with international publishers and scientific societies. It currently operates as a global, independent and non-profit initiative.
Objectives
DORA emerged in response to a problem identified in research assessment: the use of journal-based metrics, especially the impact factor, to assess articles and inform hiring, promotion or funding decisions. The founding declaration recalls that this indicator was designed to manage journals, not to measure the quality of individual research outputs, and points to limitations such as the uneven distribution of citations, differences between disciplines and the lack of transparency of the data used. DORA therefore proposes that assessment should focus on the content of each contribution, rather than on the metric of the journal in which it is published (DORA, 2012).
On this basis, the initiative pursues several objectives: to reduce the use of journal-based metrics as a proxy for scientific quality; to promote a more appropriate assessment of research outputs; to broaden what is recognised as a relevant contribution, including not only articles but also data and software; and to support broader forms of assessment that include qualitative indicators and the influence of research on policy and practice (DORA, 2012). In its current formulation, DORA also defines its mission as advancing practical approaches to assessment and facilitating assessment policies and practices (DORA, s. f.-a).
The initiative seeks to achieve these objectives through a twofold mechanism. First, the 2012 declaration establishes a framework of recommendations for replacing the use of journal-based metrics with criteria focused on the quality of the work itself and on a more diverse range of research outputs. Second, the 2023–2026 strategic plan strengthens DORA’s operational dimension by prioritising awareness of the negative effects of inappropriate metrics, the development of concrete reform measures, support for those driving these changes and the securing of resources to sustain its mission. Implementation is therefore articulated through practical guidance, the dissemination of resources and support for research assessment reform processes (DORA, 2012; DORA, 2023).
Beneficiaries and stakeholders
Researchers and evaluators are the direct beneficiaries; indirectly, universities, funding agencies, publishers and science policy-makers who design or apply assessment systems are also affected.
Results
- It has become established as an international framework, with 27,058 individual and organisational signatories from 172 countries as of April 2026 (DORA, s. f.-b).
- It has developed a resource library to support responsible assessment policies and practices, including guides, guidance documents and tools aimed at different audiences. These resources include recent documents such as Guidance on the responsible use of quantitative indicators in research assessment (2024) and A Practical Guide to Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at Research Performing Organizations (2025) (DORA, s. f.-c).
- It has published a collection of case studies from universities and national consortia documenting elements of institutional change to improve the assessment of academic careers (DORA, s. f.-d).
- It has developed Reformscape, a searchable collection of criteria and standards for hiring, review, promotion and tenure in academic careers; it brings together more than 200 source documents from over 20 countries (DORA, s. f.-e).
Challenges
The effective adoption of DORA’s principles is uneven, due to the persistence of systems based on established metrics and the complexity of reforming institutional practices. The voluntary nature of endorsement may lead to symbolic commitments without real change, raising challenges for monitoring and implementation. Its distributed governance and global scope also entail challenges of coordination, sustainability and adaptation to local contexts (DORA, 2023).
Interest and transferability
DORA provides a reference framework, and its transferable value does not lie in reproducing the initiative literally, but in adapting its principles to specific institutional policies and processes. Along these lines, Curry et al. (2020) note that this type of framework only has an effect when it is translated into practices and adjusted to the relevant organisational context. The case studies compiled by DORA provide concrete examples of this adaptation.
At the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, the reform shifted the focus of hiring and career progression criteria away from journal-based outputs towards a broader assessment of achievements; at the University of Glasgow, the review of academic promotion incorporated institutional collaboration and open research as expectations for progression, gave equal merit to research outputs and social impact, and was accompanied by measures such as narrative approaches to assessment (DORA, s. f.-d). These cases suggest that transfer requires operational specificity, training and institutional adaptation, and does not occur automatically through formal endorsement alone.
Bibliography
- DORA. (2012). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read/
- DORA. (2023). Strategic Plan 2023–2026. https://sfdora.org/strategic-plan/
- DORA. (s. f.-a). About DORA. https://sfdora.org/about-dora/ [Accessed 17/04/2026].
- DORA. (s. f.-b). Signers. https://sfdora.org/signers/ [Accessed 17/04/2026].
- DORA. (s. f.-c). Resource Library. https://sfdora.org/resource-library/ [Accessed 17/04/2026].
- DORA. (s. f.-d). Case Studies. https://sfdora.org/dora-case-studies/ [Accessed 17/04/2026].
- DORA. (s. f.-e). Reformscape. https://sfdora.org/reformscape/ [Accessed 17/04/2026].
- Curry, S., de Rijcke, S., Hatch, A., Pillay, D., van der Weijden, I. y Wilsdon, J. (2020). The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: progress, obstacles and the way ahead. RoRI Working Paper No. 3. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13227914
Specific information
Topic: New models of research assessment
Type of initiative: Declaration / manifesto
Implementation scale: International
Responsible agents: Universities (governing bodies), Researchers, Publishers
Location: Worldwide
Key words: research assessment, open knowledge, metrics
Start and end date: 2012 -
Sustainability: Active with documented continuity
PDF Document:
Download file
Search by
Authorship information
Created on: 07/03/2021
Last updated: 17/03/2026
Author of record: Berta Ollé Pérez
Institution author: Universitat de Barcelona